Israel Is Not an Excuse

There is a familiar answer when a command from the Old Testament becomes uncomfortable: “That was only for the Jews.” Sometimes that answer may point toward a real distinction. Scripture contains instructions tied to priests, sacrifices, the land, particular offices, and particular circumstances. But the phrase is often used as though one fact settles the whole case: Israel received the command, therefore everyone else is exempt.

Scripture does not let the question end there.

Israel Received It — But Who Was Expected to Obey?

At the Passover, Exodus 12:49 states that one law was to apply to the native-born and to the stranger dwelling among Israel. Numbers 15 makes the point even more explicitly: the congregation and the stranger were to have one statute, described as an ordinance enduring through their generations, with one law and one manner for both.

That does not prove that every command given to ancient Israel applies identically to every person in every age. It proves something narrower — and fatal to the shortcut: being a foreigner was not, by itself, a blanket exemption from God's instruction.

“The question is not merely, ‘Who first received the command?’ The question is, ‘What does Scripture say about whom it governs?’”

The Prophets Expected Foreigners to Join Themselves to the LORD

Isaiah 56 speaks directly to foreigners who join themselves to the LORD. They are not pictured as standing outside God's ways because they were not born Israelites. The passage specifically describes foreigners who love the name of the LORD, serve him, hold fast his covenant, and keep the Sabbath from profaning it. They are welcomed to God's holy mountain and house of prayer.

The point is difficult to reconcile with the claim that a command becomes irrelevant simply because someone can call it “Jewish.” Isaiah's foreigner is not told that covenant faithfulness belongs to somebody else's ethnicity. He is described as joining himself to the God who gave the instruction.

• Exodus 12:49 explicitly gives one law to the native-born and the stranger dwelling among Israel.
• Numbers 15:15-16 repeats the principle: one ordinance and one law for the congregation and the stranger.
• Isaiah 56:6-7 describes foreigners joining themselves to the LORD, holding fast his covenant, and being welcomed into his house of prayer.
• The biblical test is therefore not ethnicity alone, but what Scripture itself says about the command, its purpose, and those to whom it applies.

What Changes in the New Testament?

The New Testament does not solve the Gentile question by saying, “God's instructions were Jewish, so Gentiles need none of them.” Acts 15 itself shows the apostles wrestling with what should be required of Gentile believers. The dispute was real precisely because Gentiles were coming to the God of Israel without first becoming Jews.

Paul likewise tells Gentile believers that they were once strangers to the covenants of promise and alienated from the commonwealth of Israel, but in Christ they have been brought near. Whatever conclusions one reaches about individual commandments, “you are Gentile” is an odd argument to make from a text that describes Gentiles as no longer strangers and foreigners but fellow citizens with the saints.

What This Entry Doesn't Claim

This Exhibit does not claim that every instruction given to ancient Israel can simply be lifted out of its setting and imposed unchanged today. Commands concerning the Levitical priesthood, sacrifices, civil administration, the land, ritual conditions, and other covenant-specific circumstances have to be read in their own biblical context. Scripture itself supplies distinctions, developments, fulfilments, and applications that must be taken seriously.

The claim is much smaller: “That was given to Israel” is not, by itself, an argument. It identifies the historical recipients. It does not establish the continuing scope of the command. That conclusion has to come from Scripture.

If the defence wishes to show that a command no longer applies, it must produce the evidence. The word Jewish cannot do the work of a text.

← Back to Exhibits